Author summary
⁠57%5 analyzed articles/videos1,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thibault Spirlet results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,104 hits. Analysis detected 10,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,105 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (3,422 of 6,330 authors). This Thibault Spirlet is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Thibault Spirlet
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠46%Thibault Spirlet (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,105
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 10.9%10.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos