Speaker summary
47% 39 analyzed articles/videos 2,253.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thom Tillis results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Emotion , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 394 hits . Analysis detected 4,483.973 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,253.667 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,685 of 25,876 speakers). This Thom Tillis is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Thom Tillis
Speaker details
Total words: 2,253.667
Article count: 39
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score39 analyzed videos2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst