Speaker summary
36% 23 analyzed articles/videos 2,496.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Swift results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Halo Effect , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 176.653 hits . Analysis detected 1,830.159 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496.333 analyzed words across 23 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,695 of 26,730 speakers). This Taylor Swift is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group. Taylor Swift
Speaker details
Total words: 2,496.333
Content count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score23 analyzed videos2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst