Speaker summary
36%23 analyzed articles/videos2,496.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Swift results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 176.653 hits. Analysis detected 1,830.159 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496.333 analyzed words across 23 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,695 of 26,730 speakers). This Taylor Swift is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score23 analyzed videos2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate