Author summary
87% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inae Oh results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 1,983 hits . Analysis detected 12,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,600 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,023 of 6,357 authors). This Inae Oh is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Inae Oh
Author details
Total words: 7,600
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.1% 26.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst