Trump Puts Words in the Mouths of Dead Soldiers ⁠93%

By Inae Oh⁠87%

7/22/2026, 4:29:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 762 faulty-reasoning hits from 304 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,477 of 21,173 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump’s open disdain for Americans who have died in war, “losers” and “suckers,” in his estimation , is well documented. 
But that hasn’t stopped him from exploiting fallen soldiers to prop up support for himself. 
This time, it’s the four service members who were killed over the last week as the US returns to full-scale war with Iran. 
“All of them said very strongly, ‘We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon,'” Trump told reporters as he departed to attend a dignified transfer, the process by which the remains of fallen military members are moved from aircraft to vehicle, in Dover, Delaware, on Wednesday. 
There is no evidence that the service members killed, as Trump so confidently claimed, ever said or believed this. 
It conveniently happens to be one of the exceedingly few talking points Trump has had for continuing an increasingly unpopular war on all his own. 
And what better device for repeating his excuse than dead Americans who can’t speak for themselves? 
The assertion was made, without evidence or apparent shame, shortly after the president appeared to boast on social media about the total number of service members killed since the US first launched strikes against Iran in February. 
In doing so, Trump referred to the casualties of previous wars, seemingly arguing that 18 wasn’t so bad. 
“Afghanistan War: 20 years, 2,000 DEAD. 
Iraq War: 9 years, 4,600 DEAD. 
Vietnam War: 19 years and 5 months, 58,220 DEAD. 
Korean War: 3 years and 1 month, 36,574 DEAD. 
Venezuela War: 1 day, 0 DEAD. 
Iran Military Conflict: 4 months, 18 DEAD.” 
The comments are the latest evidence of Trump’s long-held, blatant disregard for those killed in war. 
Meanwhile, his administration’s celebration of war, both in absurd pageantry and ethos , continues apace. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.2%Inae Oh: 10.8%Mother Jones: 4.0%Confirmation Bias10.2%This article: 9.9%Inae Oh: 1.4%Mother Jones: 0.7%Anchoring Bias9.9%This article: 4.3%Inae Oh: 5.3%Mother Jones: 3.2%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 2.4%Mother Jones: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.3%Inae Oh: 2.7%Mother Jones: 0.8%Hindsight Bias5.3%This article: 6.3%Inae Oh: 1.3%Mother Jones: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 2.2%Mother Jones: 7.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.3%Mother Jones: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Inae Oh: 2.2%Mother Jones: 1.7%Pessimism Bias13.2%This article: 20.4%Inae Oh: 15.6%Mother Jones: 9.6%Negativity Bias20.4%This article: 8.2%Inae Oh: 1.0%Mother Jones: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias8.2%This article: 5.9%Inae Oh: 5.6%Mother Jones: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error5.9%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.8%Mother Jones: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 2.7%Mother Jones: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 1.7%Mother Jones: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 3.6%Mother Jones: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 3.2%Mother Jones: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 19.7%Inae Oh: 2.4%Mother Jones: 1.1%Recency Bias19.7%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 4.7%Mother Jones: 1.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.9%Mother Jones: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.1%Inae Oh: 2.9%Mother Jones: 3.5%Appeal to Authority15.1%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 3.5%Mother Jones: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.1%Mother Jones: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Inae Oh: 18.5%Mother Jones: 4.7%Hasty Generalization2.0%This article: 4.9%Inae Oh: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.2%Red Herring4.9%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 1.6%Mother Jones: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.3%Inae Oh: 3.6%Mother Jones: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion5.3%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 3.8%Mother Jones: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 20.4%Inae Oh: 3.0%Mother Jones: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)20.4%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.3%Inae Oh: 1.0%Mother Jones: 0.5%Burden of Proof6.3%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.3%Inae Oh: 1.4%Mother Jones: 0.3%Composition/Division5.3%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 3.9%Mother Jones: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.9%Inae Oh: 1.9%Mother Jones: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.9%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.1%Inae Oh: 4.6%Mother Jones: 1.8%Unattributed Quote15.1%This article: 15.1%Inae Oh: 3.8%Mother Jones: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection15.1%This article: 34.5%Inae Oh: 26.1%Mother Jones: 9.3%Biased Writer Voice34.5%This article: 5.3%Inae Oh: 3.0%Mother Jones: 1.8%Indoctrination5.3%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 5.2%Mother Jones: 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Inae Oh: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Inae Oh: 3.1%Mother Jones: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.2%

304 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech258writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-40.7 ptsWriter: 40.7%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.3 ptsWriter: 14.3%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.