Keyword summary
26% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,046 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Weapon results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,616 hits . Analysis detected 20,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,670 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (28,096 of 34,358 keywords). This Nuclear Weapon is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Nuclear Weapon
Keyword details
Total words: 22,670
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score10 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst