Topic summary
78% 27 analyzed articles/videos 6,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Deal results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 5,648 hits . Analysis detected 49,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,391 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (9,761 of 15,690 topics). This Iran Nuclear Deal is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Iran Nuclear Deal
Topic details
Total words: 38,391
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score27 analyzed articles38.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst