Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scarlett Kennedy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 850 hits. Analysis detected 3,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (1,738 of 6,628 authors). This Scarlett Kennedy is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Scarlett Kennedy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠74%Scarlett Kennedy (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 25.6%25.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos