Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Mary Harrington results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 1,566 hits . Analysis detected 12,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,790 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,263 authors). This Mary Harrington is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mary Harrington
Author details
Total words: 12,790
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.2% 12.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst