Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Ehalt results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 1,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,693 of 6,628 authors). This Matt Ehalt is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Matt Ehalt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
75%Matt Ehalt (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,472
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510074.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.1%10.1%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Travis Kelce39%
New York Post89%By Matt Ehalt0%7/11/2026, 5:47:20 AM