Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauryn Overhultz results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 5,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,306 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,263 of 6,348 authors). This Lauryn Overhultz is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Lauryn Overhultz
Author details
Total words: 7,306
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst