Speaker summary
55% 11 analyzed articles/videos 386.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruben Gallego results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 81.796 hits . Analysis detected 812.527 faulty-reasoning hits from 386.667 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (25,136 of 26,780 speakers). This Ruben Gallego is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Ruben Gallego
Speaker details
Total words: 386.667
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 7.4% BS Score11 analyzed videos386.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst