Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natasha Korecki results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 484 hits . Analysis detected 3,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,184 of 6,427 authors). This Natasha Korecki is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Natasha Korecki
Author details
Total words: 3,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst