Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adriel Perez-Gonzalez results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 2,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,254 of 6,359 authors). This Adriel Perez-Gonzalez is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Adriel Perez-Gonzalez
Author details
Total words: 2,192
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.3% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.4% 19.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 12.8% 12.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst