Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Katz results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 2,646 hits . Analysis detected 32,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,178 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,165 of 6,227 authors). This Michael Katz is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Michael Katz
Author details
Total words: 31,178
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score15 analyzed articles31.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst