Speaker summary
34% 32 analyzed articles/videos 841.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pew Research Center results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Confirmation Bias , and Recency Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 1,117.943 faulty-reasoning hits from 841.667 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,662 of 28,364 speakers). This Pew Research Center is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Pew Research Center
Speaker details
Total words: 841.667
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score32 analyzed videos841.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst