Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Joseph Castleberry results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 59.8% saturation with 1,194 hits. Analysis detected 4,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,995 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Joseph Castleberry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Joseph Castleberry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Joseph Castleberry (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,995
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 59.9%59.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 20.1%20.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.3%7.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.8%6.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Author 59.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 18.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos