Author summary
36% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherina Gioino results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 2,394 hits . Analysis detected 23,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,118 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,176 of 6,323 authors). This Catherina Gioino is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Catherina Gioino
Author details
Total words: 29,118
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles29.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst