Author summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Hong results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Recency Bias , and Framing Effect , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,841 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,346 of 6,361 authors). This Joshua Hong is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Joshua Hong
Author details
Total words: 2,841
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst