Speaker summary
65% 13 analyzed articles/videos 1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Menin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 376.18 hits . Analysis detected 3,153.66 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,392 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,464 of 28,364 speakers). This Julie Menin is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Julie Menin
Speaker details
Total words: 1,392
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score13 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 27.0% 27.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst