Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Sadie Brown results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 563 hits . Analysis detected 4,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,693 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Sadie Brown is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sadie Brown
Author details
Total words: 4,693
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.0%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst