amny.com42%

City Council aids struggling paraprofessionals with one-time $10,000 pay bump 66%

By Sadie Brown0%

7/18/2026, 10:00:05 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 1,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,105 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.1% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,246 of 21,122 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the article peer group.

The New York City Council approved Thursday a bill authorizing one-time, $10,000 supplemental wages for the city’s teaching aides, known as paraprofessionals, to bolster their compensation until the city can negotiate a more attractive contract with ed unions. 
The “Respect” Check , as it’s known, will pay paraprofessionals in four installments that are outside the city's collective bargaining agreement as a way to stabilize the workforce which still has some 1,600 vacancies. 
Paraprofessionals, sometimes called paras, in NYC Public Schools have a starting wage of $32,500, leaving many in the profession on the financial edge and unable to afford basic necessities. 
President of the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) , Michael Mulgrew said the abysmal pay structure was hindering New York City’s Department of Education’s (DOE) ability to provide federally mandated services to students with disabilities and receive an Individualized Educational Plan. 
“We are trying to make sure that our school system is able to pull out of a significant crisis, one it has never faced like this before,” Mulgrew said. 
“At the same time, to do justice for the people who have been left dealing with the crisis, people whose jobs have become much, much, much more difficult over the years.” 
UFT leadership, lawmakers and education advocates have criticized the city for its failure to invest in paraprofessionals, pointing to a surge in special education lawsuits, known as Carter Cases, as a direct result of the paraprofessional shortage. 
Mulgrew told amNewYork that everyone loses when the city’s paras are underpaid. 
 It's just morally wrong that the city would rather keep paraprofessionals in poverty and also allow our school system to not supply legally mandated services to our most challenged students,” Mulgrew said. 
The bill’s sponsor, and mother to a child in the public school system, Council Member Carmen De La Rosa (D-Manhattan), celebrated Thursday ahead of the full vote, noting that the Respect Check bill has been a coordinated effort on behalf of the entire city council, borough presidents the public advocate, unions and teachers. 
She called paraprofessionals “the backbone” of the special education system. 
“Through this bill, we will be able to retain the talented men and women that keep our educational system afloat,” De La Rosa said. 
The city's school system is short an estimated 1,600 paraprofessionals, leaving the remaining workforce to cover larger caseloads of legally mandated special education support. 
They say the shortage can't be solved without meaningful wage increases. 
Photo: Lloyd Mitchell 
Gerry Scales is a veteran paraprofessional and chapter leader with over 30 years in education. 
He works with the Manhattan Occupational School, a specialized public school serving NYC students with the most significant needs. 
He told amNewYork that he starts his day around 6:30 A.M. to assist students with riding the bus to school. 
Then, Scales spends the school day as a behavioral paraprofessional, helping students that may have behavioral issues in the classroom. 
 A lot of factors sometimes goes into the kids' behavior,” Scales said. 
They could have had a bad night at home; they didn't get enough sleep; they didn't get enough to eat. 
There may be something in the classroom that they may not like, but they can't express it, so they act out. 
There's so many different types of factors that goes into a kid's behavior sometimes.” 
But since the pandemic, Scales’ school has been short on classroom paraprofessionals, who he says would normally help with clerical work and cover for other paras who may be absent. 
The extra work has put strain on the remaining staff. 
“During the day, we have a lot of different crisis with different students because of the para shortage,” Scales said. 
Together, Scales and his wife raised four children, who are now adults. 
He said that we wouldn’t necessarily use the word “tough” to describe supporting a family on a paraprofessional’s salary, “but it wasn’t easy.” 
Scales said that in the later years of his career, the extra boost could mean more financial stability before he heads into retirement. 
 I can do some of the things that I always wanted to do, Scales said. 
“I could travel a little bit more; I can probably help out some other family members that may need my help. 
That ten thousand dollars, it would mean the world to me.” 
But not everyone is celebrating Thursday’s 49-0 vote as a win. 
Mayor Zohran Mamdani raised concerns about the payments running afoul of the “Taylor Law,” which sets rules for the way public employers can negotiate contracts with public employees. 
Mamdani praised the work of paraprofessionals as “indispensable” and said the city owes them “a profound debt of gratitude,” but cast doubt on the bills’ legality. 
“I have been clear that questions of compensation are best resolved through the collective bargaining process that respects workers and their unions. 
However, the Council's passage of this legislation is in direct violation of the Taylor law. 
Our administration is reviewing the final language carefully and working to determine the appropriate next steps.” 
City Council Speaker Julie Menin criticized City Hall at a press conference Thursday, saying that the Mamdani administration was not a willing partner in solving paraprofessional pay through the budget or collective bargaining, 
“The administration did not want to do either of them,” Menin said. 
“So, the council is going to use every tool in its toolbox to act.” 
Speaker Julie Menin criticized Mayor Zohran Mamdani, saying that the administration wasn't a willing partner in other, more favorable paths toward increasing paraprofessional's pay. 
Photo: Lloyd Mitchell 
Menin, Mulrew and other lawmakers also touted the bill’s fiscal benefits, which they predict will reduce the "ballooning" cost of Carter Cases that cost DOE over $1 billion dollars a year. 
Terrible pay isn’t the only barrier to attracting qualified candidates to paraprofessional work in NYC. 
To become a full-time para in NYC public schools, a person must first serve as a substitute paraprofessional . 
Mulgrew described a convoluted and confusing hiring process through DOE, which he said ultimately prevents children from accessing the paraprofessional services they are legally required to have. 
He said the issues compound one another and make the shortage difficult to address. 
 You have no training, you have extremely low pay that you can't pay your bills on, and even though you were told you could become a full-time power and at least have benefits, it's almost impossible to do because it'll take years,” Mulgrew said. 
Mayor Mamdani still could veto the bill, but as it stands, City Council has more than the supermajority needed to override a veto. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.9%Sadie Brown: 3.2%amNewYork: 3.3%Confirmation Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Sadie Brown: 3.9%amNewYork: 3.8%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.7%amNewYork: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Sadie Brown: 0.3%amNewYork: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 3.9%Sadie Brown: 3.4%amNewYork: 5.4%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 1.9%Sadie Brown: 0.4%amNewYork: 1.1%Loss Aversion1.9%This article: 5.6%Sadie Brown: 1.3%amNewYork: 0.9%Status Quo Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.0%Sadie Brown: 4.9%amNewYork: 3.8%Optimism Bias9.0%This article: 5.8%Sadie Brown: 1.4%amNewYork: 1.3%Pessimism Bias5.8%This article: 20.8%Sadie Brown: 7.0%amNewYork: 7.2%Negativity Bias20.8%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.6%amNewYork: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Sadie Brown: 2.6%amNewYork: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error2.5%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Sadie Brown: 2.8%amNewYork: 0.8%In-Group Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.7%amNewYork: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Sadie Brown: 2.0%amNewYork: 2.3%Halo Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Sadie Brown: 0.9%amNewYork: 1.1%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Sadie Brown: 2.7%amNewYork: 0.4%Ad Hominem6.2%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.7%amNewYork: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.3%Sadie Brown: 0.8%amNewYork: 3.7%Appeal to Authority3.3%This article: 1.0%Sadie Brown: 4.4%amNewYork: 1.3%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 1.3%Sadie Brown: 0.3%amNewYork: 0.6%Slippery Slope1.3%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.6%Sadie Brown: 6.2%amNewYork: 4.1%Hasty Generalization10.6%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.0%Sadie Brown: 2.5%amNewYork: 0.5%Bandwagon1.0%This article: 9.1%Sadie Brown: 9.7%amNewYork: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion9.1%This article: 2.6%Sadie Brown: 0.6%amNewYork: 1.2%Begging the Question2.6%This article: 28.0%Sadie Brown: 12.0%amNewYork: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)28.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.4%Sadie Brown: 3.0%amNewYork: 1.7%Anecdotal9.4%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.7%Sadie Brown: 0.9%amNewYork: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.7%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Sadie Brown: 0.3%amNewYork: 0.1%Middle Ground1.4%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 1.5%amNewYork: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 1.0%amNewYork: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.9%Sadie Brown: 1.6%amNewYork: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice5.9%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.2%amNewYork: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sadie Brown: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Sadie Brown: 0.8%amNewYork: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.4%

1105 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers72%attributed speech310writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 41 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 31 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Federation of Teachers (UFT) • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageCarmen De La Rosa • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCarmen De La Rosa • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 23 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 23 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGerry Scales • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 28 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 26 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 22 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 15 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mulgrew • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Julie Menin

100%flagged-word coverage
114 attributed words14% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice+16.2 ptsWriter: 11.0%Julie Menin: 27.2%27.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%Julie Menin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.