Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public School Funding results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 3,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,315 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Public School Funding is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Public School Funding
Topic details
Total words: 3,315
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 17.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos