ABC News22%

New diagnoses slow in NYC Legionnaires' disease outbreak; source still unclear 21%

By JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press30%

7/14/2026, 3:11:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 329 faulty-reasoning hits from 433 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,429 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the article peer group.

NEW YORK -- A Legionnaires' disease outbreak in a New York City neighborhood now counts 60 cases, but new diagnoses are slowing, health officials said Tuesday. 
They reported progress on inspections for the disease-causing bacteria but still haven’t pinpointed a source. 
No one has died in the outbreak on Manhattan's Upper East Side, but 49 patients have required hospitalization, though 34 so far have gone home, city Health Commissioner Dr. 
Alister Martin said. 
City data show two new cases were diagnosed from samples taken Thursday through Saturday, compared to as many as 11 per day from earlier samples. 
“All of these things together paint an encouraging sign,” Martin said at a virtual news briefing. 
It came a day after City Council Speaker Julie Menin, a Democrat and Upper East Side resident, complained that the Health Department wasn't doing and disclosing enough. 
A message seeking comment was sent Tuesday to Menin's office. 
Legionnaires' disease is a form of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria, which grow in warm water and can spread in building cooling systems, hot tubs and showerheads. 
In many cases, people contract the disease by inhaling tiny droplets of contaminated water; Legionnaire's doesn't spread person-to-person. 
The illness is treatable, but it is fatal in about 10% of cases, according to the U.S. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
Seven people died and more than 100 were sickened during an outbreak last year in New York's Harlem neighborhood. 
The sources turned out to include cooling towers  devices sometimes used for cooling large buildings  at a city-run hospital and the site of the city's public health lab. 
Health officials are working to identify the origin of the Upper East Side outbreak, which was first identified on July 2 from two cases in close proximity. 
The investigation expanded to encompass three heavily residential ZIP codes. 
The city said Tuesday it has inspected all 183 cooling towers in the area, and 76 of them came up positive on first-round tests that don't distinguish between live and dead bacteria. 
Those buildings included the Guggenheim Museum, Park and Fifth Avenue apartment houses, private schools and more. 
The Guggenheim and 56 other buildings so far have completed required cleanups, which entail draining and disinfecting the cooling towers, Martin said. 
The other 19 buildings that tested positive are due to do so by Thursday. 
Martin noted that the city used to await results from second-round tests for live bacteria before ordering such cleanups but this year decided not to hold off. 
The tests take about two weeks. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.9%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.7%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias6.9%This article: 5.8%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 2.9%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias5.8%This article: 4.4%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 2.2%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic4.4%This article: 4.2%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.0%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.8%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias7.4%This article: 6.2%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 5.0%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect6.2%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 6.2%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.6%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect6.2%This article: 3.7%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 11.2%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 3.8%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias15.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.3%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.4%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.6%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.4%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.3%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority1.4%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.6%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 1.6%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JENNIFER PELTZ Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

433 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers17%attributed speech359writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alister Martin

100%flagged-word coverage
68 attributed words92% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote+4.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alister Martin: 4.4%4.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.