Exclusive 49%

By Nicole Rosenthal0%

7/10/2026, 12:45:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 1,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 989 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,357 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the article peer group.

See more of our coverage in your search results. 
Add The New York Post on Google 
More than half of the Upper East Side water cooling towers under investigation for a Legionnaires’ disease outbreak were dinged by health officials during their latest inspections, The Post has learned. 
The violations  issued between March 2025 and March 2026 at roughly 59% of the cooling centers in the three zip codes under the city’s probe  include failing to perform regular monitoring and cleaning and failing to submit Legionella test results to the health department, as required by law, records show. 
The sites with the highest number of violations in the Carnegie Hill and Yorkville neighborhoods include 1520 York Ave., with nine violations, and 1101 Lexington Ave., with seven violations. 
Water cooling towers in a section of the Upper East Side under investigation for a Legionnaires’ disease outbreak were dinged by health officials in their latest inspections. 
AFP via Getty Images 
Both were dinged with cleaning, monitoring, chemical use and Legionella sampling infractions in February. 
A total of eight cooling towers in the affected area were not collecting, recording, analyzing or submitting Legionella samples to the city, as mandated by law, since March 2025, according to records. 
Those towers are located at: 445 East 86th St.; 247 E 87th St.; 188 E 78th St; 1520 York Ave.; 1150 Madison Ave.; 1101 Lexington Ave.; 1025 Madison Ave.; and 1010 Park Ave. 
Meanwhile, more than 200 water cooling towers across the city were flagged for violations during the same period, including 70 Legionella-related monitoring violations. 
“We enforce laws and we institute fines, when people fail to meet the city’s requirements to maintain their cooling towers  if they’re not testing regularly, or reporting what they need to report to us,” a city Health Department rep told The Post. 
Fines start at $500 and can rise to $2,000 for repeat violations. 
The violations include failing to perform regular monitoring and cleaning, as well as submitting Legionella test results to the health department. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention via AP 
“But, the most important thing now is sampling every tower that we need to,” the rep said, “and then ordering all of them to remediate if they come back positive for even the presence of dead or alive Legionella.” 
The latest Legionnaires’ outbreak in the Big Apple, first reported on July 2, has sickened 36 people in the 10028, 10128, and 10075 zip codes as of Wednesday . 
Cases are expected to rise with additional testing as city investigators continue to probe the source. 
The outbreak follows a deadly cluster that killed seven people and sickened 114 more in Harlem last summer. 
More than 200 water cooling towers across the city were flagged for violations during the same time period, including 70 violations for Legionella-related monitoring. 
Universal Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images 
This year’s investigation is expected to take longer, as there are roughly three times as many cooling towers in this investigation zone as in Harlem, according to a source familiar with the matter. 
A new law, which went into effect in May, now requires cooling towers to be tested for Legionella bacteria every month. 
Before that, testing was only required every three months. 
But only about half of all active cooling towers in the affected Upper East Side zip codes had Legionella test results on file from this year, Gothamist reported. 
The outbreak follows a deadly cluster that claimed seven and sickened 114 in Harlem last year. 
Juan  stock.adobe.com 
As of Thursday, the health department had tested “almost all” of the cooling towers in the affected area, and results are coming in on a “rolling basis.” 
The mayor’s office has also vowed to release the addresses of buildings that test positive for Legionella. 
So far, one cooling tower at 1511 Third Avenue has tested positive for the bacteria, CBS News first reported. 
That cooling tower  which has amassed dozens of violations since 2017  was last inspected by health department officials in December 2024, despite the city’s goal of inspecting each site at least once a year. 
Any cooling tower that has already tested preliminarily positive during the latest outbreak  either containing dead or live Legionella bacteria  has been ordered to be completely drained and disinfected, a health department rep confirmed. 
As part of the investigation, city inspectors must compare the DNA sequencing of Legionella bacteria found in cooling towers that tested positive with that of samples from sickened New Yorkers. 
“Every day that goes by that they’re not disinfecting is another day that more and more people can get sick and potentially die of Legionnaires, and that’s totally and wholly unacceptable,” NYC Council Speaker Julie Menin said. 
Camara Porter/AdMedia/MediaPunch/Shutterstock 
Speaking at an unrelated event Thursday, New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin, who represents the Upper East Side, said she remains “very concerned” that the source of the spread has yet to be found. 
“We represent a neighborhood that is very dense and has a lot of seniors,” Menin said Thursday, adding that she has sent a letter to the health commissioner demanding the agency order the buildings that have not yet been inspected  or where the cases have not yet come back negative  to be disinfected proactively. 
“We’re going to wait for more people to get sick and potentially die,” she added. 
“Every day that goes by that they’re not disinfecting is another day that more and more people can get sick and potentially die of Legionnaires  and that’s totally and wholly unacceptable.” 
The outbreak follows a deadly cluster that claimed seven and sickened 114 in Harlem last year. 
Juan - stock.adobe.com 
“Every day that goes by that they're not disinfecting is another day that more and more people can get sick and potentially die of Legionnaires, and that's totally and wholly unacceptable," NYC Council Speaker Julie Menin said. 
Camara Porter/AdMedia/MediaPunch/Shutterstock 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 6.2%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 4.0%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 1.2%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion1.2%This article: 2.1%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.7%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.9%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 6.9%Nicole Rosenthal: 5.1%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 39.3%Nicole Rosenthal: 19.2%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias39.3%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Nicole Rosenthal: 1.9%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Nicole Rosenthal: 2.8%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.9%Nicole Rosenthal: 4.0%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority11.9%This article: 1.5%Nicole Rosenthal: 2.4%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 10.7%Nicole Rosenthal: 7.7%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope10.7%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 2.0%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.5%Nicole Rosenthal: 16.0%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion19.5%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.1%Nicole Rosenthal: 1.7%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.1%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.9%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.6%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal1.9%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.1%Nicole Rosenthal: 1.7%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote5.1%This article: 14.7%Nicole Rosenthal: 7.4%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection14.7%This article: 5.3%Nicole Rosenthal: 2.1%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice5.3%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.5%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Rosenthal: 0.0%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Nicole Rosenthal: 1.3%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

989 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech612writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageHealth Department • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHealth Department • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageGothamist • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageCBS News • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageHealth Department • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 56 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Menin • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Julie Menin

100%flagged-word coverage
212 attributed words56% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Quote-first Misdirection+50.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Julie Menin: 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Julie Menin: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Julie Menin: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Julie Menin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.