Speaker summary
51% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Metcalf results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 274.507 hits . Analysis detected 1,767.328 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,504 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (27,989 of 28,169 speakers). This Jeff Metcalf is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Jeff Metcalf
Speaker details
Total words: 1,504
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score8 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst