Author summary
30% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Bowman results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 3,200 hits . Analysis detected 15,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,348 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,614 of 6,162 authors). This Rachel Bowman is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Rachel Bowman
Author details
Total words: 23,348
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst