Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natasha Anderson at LaGuardia Airport results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 455 hits . Analysis detected 1,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,531 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,038 of 6,185 authors). This Natasha Anderson at LaGuardia Airport is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Natasha Anderson at LaGuardia Airport
Author details
Total words: 4,531
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst