Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katrina Schollenberger results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,049 hits. Analysis detected 4,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,267 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (3,405 of 6,244 authors). This Katrina Schollenberger is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Katrina Schollenberger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠46%Katrina Schollenberger (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,267
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.6%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos