Killer teen Karmelo Anthony shows NO emotion as court is played harrowing 911 call of Austin Metcalf's final moments, leaving athlete's family and friends in tears: Live updates 55%

By Rachel Bowman30% Katrina Schollenberger0% Maryann Martinez60%

6/5/2026, 12:58:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 1,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 912 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,185 of 20,408 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the article peer group.

Killer teen Karmelo Anthony shows NO emotion as court is played harrowing 911 call of Austin Metcalf's final moments, leaving athlete's family and friends in tears: Live updates 
Karmelo Anthony showed no emotion on Thursday as jurors listened to the distressing 911 call made in the moments after student-athlete Austin Metcalf was fatally stabbed. 
Anthony, now 19, is standing trial for Metcalf's murder and has maintained that he acted in self-defense during the deadly pocketknife attack at a track meet in Frisco, Texas, in April 2025. 
The two teenagers, both 17 at the time, became embroiled in a dispute over seating at the Centennial High School athletics meet. 
Prosecutors contend the stabbing was an unjustified 'sneak attack,' while the defense argues Anthony feared for his safety. 
Emotional testimony began Thursday after the attorneys delivered competing opening statements in Collin County. 
Several jurors were seen crying as the court was shown a photo of Metcalf's lifeless body at the football stadium. 
The trial, which is expected to last about two weeks, has drawn significant political scrutiny, with racially charged demonstrations calling for Anthony to 'walk free.' 
A panel of 12 jurors and six alternates was selected after roughly 600 prospective jurors were questioned during a selection process that began Monday. 
No black jurors were seated on the final jury. 
Follow Daily Mail for more updates... 
Frisco firefighter Neil Adams was the first witness to take the stand on Friday. 
He responded to Austin Metcalf's stabbing on April 2, 2025. 
'He was gray, there was no respiration. 
He did not have a pulse,' Adams said. 
The firefighter described administering life-saving efforts, including giving Metcalf blood. 
'We continued monitoring and doing everything we could,' he said. 
Adams then became emotional, tears welling up, when asked whether the case affected him. 
In opening arguments on Thursday in Karmelo Anthony's murder trial, prosecutors said the baby-faced teen used a folding knife to stab Austin Metcalf at the time of their dispute. 
Metcalf lifted up his shirt once he realized he had been knifed and exclaimed, 'I've been stabbed,' before tumbling down several rows of bleachers. 
Prosecutors said his brother Hunter rushed to his aid as Anthony ran from the scene and later tried to blend into groups of kids who were fleeing the stadium. 
'If you're scared and running away in self-defense, why toss the knife,' the prosecutor said. 
'That knife wasn't used to protect him from harm. 
That knife was used to harm another. 
Find this man guilty of first-degree murder,' he continued, pointing at Anthony. 
In opening arguments on Thursday, prosecutors said that Karmelo Anthony used a folding knife to stab Austin Metcalf and then tossed it before fleeing the scene. 
As Metcalf's brother rushed to his aid, Anthony ran from the scene and later tried to blend into groups of kids who were fleeing the stadium, according to Collin County First Assistant District Attorney Bill Wirskye. 
'If you're scared and running away in self-defense, why toss the knife,' the prosecutor said. 
Rob Starr, 41, the head track coach and football coach at Frisco Memorial High School, where Austin Metcalf attended, gave emotional testimony on Thursday. 
He cried on the stand as he recounted seeing the star athlete after he had been stabbed by Karmelo Anthony. 
'What I do see is Austin on the ground and his face is purple, and he has a big hole in his chest,' Starr said, adding that he ran back to the tent. 
He said Metcalf's twin brother, Hunter, pointed at Anthony, and Starr went over to where he was. 
'I asked [Anthony]. 
He said [Metcalf] put his hands on me. 
[Anthony] was hysterical,' Starr said. 
'I jumped the gate, and I went to Hunter, and he was hysterical. 
I just knelt down, and I just prayed with him.' 
Starr sobbed, 'I just knew Austin was gone.' 
Several members of the public in the courtroom cried as the court saw a text message that Starr sent Austin one day after he died. 
'Love you, man. 
Sorry I didn't say that enough,' the text read. 
Metcalf's father, Jeff, was seen wiping away tears as the court saw the exhibit. 
The murder trial of Karmelo Anthony will resume at the Collin County Courthouse in McKinney, a Dallas suburb, today at 9am CT/10am ET. 
He is accused of murdering Austin Metcalf, 17, in April 2025 after stabbing the athlete at a high school track meet at Kuykendall Stadium. 
Metcalf bled out in his brother's arms. 
Prosecutors claim the attack was a 'senseless murder,' but Anthony has pleaded not guilty and insisted he was acting in self-defense. 
The case shocked America, and the discussion surrounding it quickly became racially fraught. 
Notably, no black jury members were selected in the high-profile trial. 
The Daily Mail was one of only two news organizations granted access to surveillance footage of the deadly incident. 
The 40-minute surveillance video, recorded from a stationary camera on the opposite side of the football field, captures the ten minutes leading up to the attack and the desperate efforts by Austin Metcalf's twin brother and others to save his life before paramedics arrived. 
Jurors will see footage of the horrific incident as evidence in the murder trial of Metcalf's killer, Karmelo Anthony. 
Anthony has admitted to stabbing Metcalf, but insists it was in self-defense. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Rachel Bowman: 1.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Rachel Bowman: 3.6%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic12.5%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.5%Rachel Bowman: 7.6%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect26.5%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 40.9%Rachel Bowman: 11.0%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias40.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Rachel Bowman: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error9.4%This article: 0.9%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 1.3%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Rachel Bowman: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem3.2%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 1.6%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.3%Rachel Bowman: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.6%Rachel Bowman: 1.1%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization2.6%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 32.5%Rachel Bowman: 13.7%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion32.5%This article: 2.9%Rachel Bowman: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 1.3%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.3%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.6%Rachel Bowman: 2.0%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal3.6%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.3%Rachel Bowman: 0.9%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote0.3%This article: 9.1%Rachel Bowman: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection9.1%This article: 32.8%Rachel Bowman: 6.3%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice32.8%This article: 2.9%Rachel Bowman: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.7%

912 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers18%attributed speech745writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Mail • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNeil Adams • 7 words • 100.0% coverageNeil Adams • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNeil Adams • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageBill Wirskye • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageRob Starr • 33 words • 100.0% coverageRob Starr • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRob Starr • 3 words • 100.0% coverageRob Starr • 8 words • 0.0% coverageRob Starr • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRob Starr • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRob Starr • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRob Starr • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageRob Starr • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rob Starr

70%flagged-word coverage
100 attributed words60% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice-40.1 ptsWriter: 40.1%Rob Starr: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+30.6 ptsWriter: 5.4%Rob Starr: 36.0%36.0%Indoctrination-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Rob Starr: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+3.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rob Starr: 3.0%3.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.