Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Starr results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 36.897 hits. Analysis detected 169.152 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (17,614 of 26,730 speakers). This Rob Starr is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Rob Starr

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
21.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.0%36.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos