Topic summary
45% 3 analyzed articles/videos 457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trial results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 1,137 hits . Analysis detected 5,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,006 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,006 of 15,685 topics). This Trial is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Trial
Topic details
Total words: 7,006
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst