Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 911 Call results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 916 hits. Analysis detected 4,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,328 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (8,974 of 15,352 topics). This 911 Call is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
911 Call
Topic details
Total words: 6,328
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos