Shocking eight woman catfight breaks out in uptown Minneapolis neighborhood that Democrat mayor insisted was 'safe' ⁠52%

By Rachel Bowman⁠30%

7/20/2026, 2:21:59 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 475 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (9,799 of 20,408 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the article peer group.

A large brawl broke out in front of a Minneapolis nightclub around the corner from a mass shooting in a neighborhood that the Democrat mayor insisted was safe. 
Footage showed several scantily clad women fighting outside of Kiss Lounge & Rooftop in the Uptown neighborhood early Sunday morning. 
Police officers appeared to break up the women who were exchanging blows and putting each other in chokeholds. 
The fight broke out around the corner from the Reign Event Center where nine people were shot just before 12.30am, KARE 11 reported. 
First responders found seven men and two women between the ages of 18 and 27 with gunshot wounds, including two men who were suffering life-threatening injuries. 
Investigators say the shooting began after an altercation, and police are working to determine whether the shots were fired from a vehicle. 
It is unclear if the fight at Kiss Lounge and the shooting at the Reign Event Center are connected. 
The venues are located within a two-minute walk of each other. 
'This incident is an unthinkable, disgusting, and cowardly act. 
This investigation remains in its early stages, and we are committed to identifying every single person responsible.' 
According to KSTP, Babu posted to her Instagram story: 'They just shot my booking up with a switch. 
Prayers to the people who were injured.' 
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey condemned the shooting, just months after insisting the Uptown neighborhood was safe. 
'The shooting in Uptown last night is intolerable, and we will be working to hold the perpetrators accountable for this senseless act of violence,' Frey said in a statement. 
'This is a stark reminder that keeping our streets safe requires every tool available.' 
'We need partnerships where the perpetrators of these acts are arrested and prosecuted, we need to continue hiring more police officers to both investigate and prevent gun crimes, and we must embrace proven technologies from drones to ShotSpotter that allow our police to do their jobs with greater efficiency.' 
'I'm grateful for the work of our police officers that immediately responded and are working towards arrests.' 
In April, Frey and disgraced former police chief Brian O'Hara held a press conference boasting about the increased safety measures in the neighborhood. 
'We hear Uptown. 
This neighborhood matters, and people need to feel safe here,' Frey said. 
'We've made progress with stronger patrols and better coordination, but there's more to do. 
That's why we're stepping up visible safety efforts, working with urgency, and pairing compassion with accountability to make Uptown safe and welcoming.' 
A month later, O'Hara resigned amid a probe into his alleged sexual misconduct on the force following a formal complaint filed against him in April 2025. 
The Daily Mail contacted the Minneapolis Police Department, the mayor's office and Kiss Lounge & Rooftop. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 1.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias6.1%This article: 12.8%Rachel Bowman: 3.6%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic12.8%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.4%Rachel Bowman: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.4%This article: 4.6%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 19.6%Rachel Bowman: 7.6%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect19.6%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.3%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 17.5%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias17.5%This article: 4.6%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias4.6%This article: 34.5%Rachel Bowman: 11.0%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias34.5%This article: 3.6%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.4%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Rachel Bowman: 1.3%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Rachel Bowman: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Rachel Bowman: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem10.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.1%Rachel Bowman: 1.6%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority14.1%This article: 10.3%Rachel Bowman: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma10.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 1.1%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 4.8%Rachel Bowman: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring4.8%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.9%Rachel Bowman: 13.7%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion18.9%This article: 4.6%Rachel Bowman: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question4.6%This article: 2.3%Rachel Bowman: 1.3%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.0%Rachel Bowman: 2.0%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal8.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.9%Rachel Bowman: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground2.9%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.7%Rachel Bowman: 0.9%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote10.7%This article: 1.9%Rachel Bowman: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 3.4%Rachel Bowman: 6.3%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice3.4%This article: 22.1%Rachel Bowman: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination22.1%This article: 3.4%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Rachel Bowman: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Rachel Bowman: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.3%

475 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers37%attributed speech299writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJacob Frey • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Frey • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJacob Frey • 49 words • 100.0% coverageJacob Frey • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Frey • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Frey • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Frey • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Frey • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageThe Daily Mail • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jacob Frey

98%flagged-word coverage
160 attributed words91% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Indoctrination+46.4 ptsWriter: 6.7%Jacob Frey: 53.1%53.1%Attempt to Sell a Product +30.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jacob Frey: 30.6%30.6%Unattributed Quote-17.1 ptsWriter: 17.1%Jacob Frey: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Jacob Frey: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Jacob Frey: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Jacob Frey: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.