Topic summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Crime results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 1,506 hits . Analysis detected 8,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,600 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,178 of 15,689 topics). This Urban Crime is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Urban Crime
Topic details
Total words: 3,600
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 5.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 41.8% 41.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 19.7% 19.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 19.1% 19.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 41.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst