Author summary
62%6 analyzed articles/videos3,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Hutchison results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 2,564 hits. Analysis detected 15,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,208 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,853 of 6,360 authors). This Joe Hutchison is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Joe Hutchison
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
40%Joe Hutchison (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,208
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate