Speaker summary
65% 36 analyzed articles/videos 2,557.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Burgum results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 494 hits . Analysis detected 5,102.265 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,557.667 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,959 of 28,364 speakers). This Doug Burgum is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Doug Burgum
Speaker details
Total words: 2,557.667
Article count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score36 analyzed videos2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst