ZeroHedge72%

United States Retains Spot As World's Top Oil Producer 36%

By Tyler Durden63%

7/12/2026, 6:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 830 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,094 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the article peer group.

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times, 
The United States was the largest crude oil producer in the world in 2025, outputting a “record-high” 13.6 million barrels per day (bpd), according to a July 9 statement from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). 
America’s output was far ahead of second-placed Russia, which produced 9.9 million bpd. 
Saudi Arabia came in third with 9.6 million bpd, with Canada in the fourth spot at 5 million bpd. 
The difference in oil output between the United States and other top producers widened last year, with Russian supplies mostly remaining unchanged year-over-year while Saudi Arabia saw a modest increase. 
The 13.6 million bpd output breaks the previous U.S. and global production record of 13.2 million bpd set in 2024. 
The United States first overtook Russia as the top global oil producer in 2018 and has since retained the number one spot. 
EIA attributed the consistently high oil production in the United States to “continued gains in drilling productivity and operational efficiency across key shale basins, which allow operators to extract more oil per well.” 
Powered by shale development, the United States has become not only the top crude oil producer “but the largest producer of crude oil ever,” the agency said. 
In addition to record-high production last year, exports have been climbing. 
In April, U.S. exports of crude oil and petroleum products hit a record, with crude oil exports averaging 5.6 million bpd, 21 percent higher than the previous record from December 2023, the EIA said in a July 8 statement. 
The exports of finished petroleum products, including jet fuel and motor gasoline, hit the highest level since December 2024. 
The record-high exports in April 2026 came amid disruptions to energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz due to the U.S.–Iran war, a development that ended up boosting global demand for American energy. 
Brent crude oil futures had hit a peak of over $126 per barrel in April. 
Prices have since come down and ended Friday at around $76. 
In its latest statement, EIA said the jump in oil production last year happened despite oil prices being lower, with the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) price dropping from an average of $77 per barrel in 2024 to $65 per barrel in 2025. 
WTI is a benchmark for crude oil produced in the United States. 
Moreover, EIA predicts America’s crude oil production to be close to 13.7 million bpd this year and to rise to 14.2 million bpd in 2027. 
Boosting Oil Production 
The higher oil output follows multiple actions taken by the Trump administration aimed at boosting production. 
In November 2025, the administration announced the approval of new oil drilling leases off the coasts of Alaska, Florida, and California. 
In January this year, the administration initiated the first step to offering oil and gas drilling leases in California, with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management seeking information on potential lease areas to auction as early as next year. 
In March, the Department of the Interior conducted an oil lease sale in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska, the first since 2019. 
This action came under criticism from the environmental group Sierra Club. 
Mike Scott, Sierra Club’s oil and gas campaign manager, in a March 18 statement, accused President Donald Trump of making oil corporation CEOs richer at the cost of the environment. 
“The Western Arctic is not just any landscape—it’s one of the last true wild places in the country, home to rare and threatened wildlife and cultures that have subsisted on the land for thousands of years,” Scott said. 
“Drilling in the Arctic won’t solve our energy crisis, but it will cause irreversible damage to these pristine landscapes. 
Big Oil has been champing at the bit to get its hands on these lands, and Trump is making their wishes come true.” 
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum had said, post the lease sale in Alaska, that the sale underscored the reserve’s vital role in strengthening America’s energy security. 
The reserve “was created to support our nation’s energy needs, and this successful sale demonstrates what’s possible when we align responsible development with that original purpose,” Burgum said. 
“Revenues from these leases will help bolster local communities, create good‑paying jobs, and ensure that Alaska continues to be a cornerstone of America’s domestic energy production.” 
Meanwhile, the U.S. 
Department of Justice has decided to ditch the oil and gas leasing restrictions imposed by the prior administration in the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. 
Alaska and its industrial development and export authority had filed lawsuits challenging the restrictions. 
On July 7, the department said that these restrictions violated federal law and asked the court to dismiss the lawsuits. 
U.S. acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said that the prior administration’s actions “improperly limited” Alaska’s energy potential through “unreasonable” regulations. 
“This settlement supports the Trump administration’s commitment to secure American energy independence and our national security for generations to come.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Tyler Durden: 7.7%ZeroHedge: 7.8%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 2.4%Tyler Durden: 1.6%ZeroHedge: 1.6%Anchoring Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 4.6%ZeroHedge: 4.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.8%ZeroHedge: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Tyler Durden: 10.8%ZeroHedge: 10.8%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Tyler Durden: 2.0%ZeroHedge: 2.1%Optimism Bias6.1%This article: 2.3%Tyler Durden: 3.7%ZeroHedge: 3.8%Pessimism Bias2.3%This article: 8.7%Tyler Durden: 11.1%ZeroHedge: 11.1%Negativity Bias8.7%This article: 1.9%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias1.9%This article: 2.4%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error2.4%This article: 3.6%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.6%This article: 5.2%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%In-Group Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.0%ZeroHedge: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Tyler Durden: 3.2%ZeroHedge: 3.3%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 2.7%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Ad Hominem6.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.6%ZeroHedge: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 28.9%Tyler Durden: 6.2%ZeroHedge: 6.2%Appeal to Authority28.9%This article: 2.3%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.3%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.4%ZeroHedge: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 6.7%ZeroHedge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.0%Tyler Durden: 5.1%ZeroHedge: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion12.0%This article: 3.4%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Begging the Question3.4%This article: 5.9%Tyler Durden: 5.4%ZeroHedge: 5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Tyler Durden: 4.1%ZeroHedge: 4.1%Unattributed Quote3.6%This article: 6.7%Tyler Durden: 1.9%ZeroHedge: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection6.7%This article: 24.3%Tyler Durden: 11.2%ZeroHedge: 11.2%Biased Writer Voice24.3%This article: 7.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Indoctrination7.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.8%ZeroHedge: 2.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

830 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers63%attributed speech304writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageEnergy Information Administration (EIA) • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageEnergy Information Administration (EIA) • 33 words • 100.0% coverageEnergy Information Administration (EIA) • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageEnergy Information Administration (EIA) • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageEnergy Information Administration (EIA) • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageEnergy Information Administration (EIA) • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of the Interior • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSierra Club • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMike Scott • 30 words • 100.0% coverageMike Scott • 38 words • 100.0% coverageMike Scott • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMike Scott • 23 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageAlaska • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Scott

100%flagged-word coverage
110 attributed words21% of attributed speech51% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.8 ptsWriter: 36.8%Mike Scott: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+34.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Scott: 34.5%34.5%Unattributed Quote+27.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Scott: 27.3%27.3%Quote-first Misdirection+20.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Scott: 20.9%20.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.