Author summary
82%4 analyzed articles/videos2,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Conley results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 2,712 hits. Analysis detected 15,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,214 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,596 of 6,466 authors). This Julia Conley is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Julia Conley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Julia Conley (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,214
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 26.6%26.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.5%18.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.3%6.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.9%3.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate