Author summary
⁠33%5 analyzed articles/videos3,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savannah Peters results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,064 hits. Analysis detected 9,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,287 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (4,680 of 6,264 authors). This Savannah Peters is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Savannah Peters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠26%Savannah Peters (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,287
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos