Author summary
59% 3 analyzed articles/videos 6,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benji Jones results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 2,037 hits . Analysis detected 19,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,699 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,276 of 6,228 authors). This Benji Jones is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Benji Jones
Author details
Total words: 24,699
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles24.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst