Author summary
50% 2 analyzed articles/videos 911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coral Murphy Marcos results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 840 hits . Analysis detected 4,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,988 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,671 of 6,628 authors). This Coral Murphy Marcos is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Coral Murphy Marcos
Author details
Total words: 4,988
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.6% 7.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst