BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 944 faulty-reasoning hits from 687 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,248 of 20,516 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump on Monday sharply reduced the size of two national monuments in Utah, undoing protections established by his Democratic predecessors on public lands that are sacred among many Native Americans. 
Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments in southern Utah have ancient cliff dwellings, petroglyphs and scenic canyons, as well as coal and uranium deposits that state officials want made available for development. 
Trump, a Republican, issued proclamations under the Antiquities Act to reduce their size by about 90% each. 
He took similar actions during his first term, but those were reversed by President Joe Biden, a Democrat. 
“This is a big day for Utah,” Utah Gov. 
Spencer Cox as he stood next to Trump at the White House Monday. 
“These monument designations are supposed to be the smallest area as possible to protect the antiquities.” 
Bears Ears was the first national monument created at the request of tribal nations that consider the land sacred. 
The landscape contains ancestral villages, ceremonial and burial sites and features in some tribes’ creation and migration stories. 
Its designation honored five tribes in the region  Navajo, Hopi, Zuni, Ute Mountain Ute and Uintah-Ouray Ute. 
Home to hundreds of thousands of objects of cultural and scientific significance, Bears Ears is jointly managed by an agreement between tribal nations and federal agencies. 
Grand Staircase-Escalante consists of cliffs, canyons, natural arches and archaeological sites, including rock paintings. 
It holds large coal reserves, while the Bears ears area has uranium. 
The national monument designation provides sweeping protections not just for significant geological features or artifacts but also for the surrounding landscape, banning drilling, mining and new construction nearby. 
Proponents of Trump’s move to downsize say the protective boundaries stretch too far and hinder mining for critical minerals. 
Trump asserted Monday that people can not hunt, fish or “virtually not even walk” on the monuments. 
That’s false: Hunting, fishing, camping and other recreation are permitted under state and federal regulations, said Steve Bloch, legal director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, a conservation group. 
Biden designated or expanded more than a dozen monuments and had a goal to conserve at least 30% of U.S. lands and waters by 2030. 
Trump’s policies are largely the opposite: He wants to tap into the natural resource wealth of federal lands that total more than 100,000 square miles (260,000 square kilometers) and offshore areas under federal control, such as in the Gulf of Mexico and off Alaska. 
That’s drawn backlash from Democrats who warn of the wholesale disposal of treasured landscapes for commercial gain. 
“Today’s executive action is another chapter in this administration’s war on the West,” Democratic Sen. 
Martin Heinrich of New Mexico said Monday. 
He added that Trump was “turning the Antiquities Act on its head.” 
Land sale proposals fell flat 
Trump Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said last year that federal officials would review and consider redrawing monument boundaries as part of a push to expand U.S. energy production. 
Trump in his current term has used proclamations to lift commercial fishing prohibitions within expansive marine monuments in areas of the Pacific Ocean and in the Atlantic Ocean off the New England coast. 
Those monuments were created by Democratic and Republican administrations. 
The effort to boost the fishing industry, which has been challenged in court, marks a dramatic shift in federal policy by prioritizing commercial interests over efforts to allow the fish supply to increase. 
Some Republicans have tried to sell or transfer federal lands to states or other entities. 
Those efforts have largely fallen flat: A push by some GOP lawmakers in the House to sell public lands ran into bipartisan opposition, while another proposal by Sen. 
Mike Lee of Utah to sell more than 3,200 square miles (8,300 square kilometers) of federal lands was removed from Republicans’ big tax and spending bill. 
The U.S. 
Supreme Court last year turned back a lawsuit from Utah officials who sought to wrest control of vast areas of public land within the state from the federal government. 
Hannah Schoenbaum reported from Salt Lake City. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.2%Matthew Brown: 4.2%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 2.0%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.8%Matthew Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 2.6%Matthew Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.7%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Matthew Brown: 7.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.8%Matthew Brown: 0.8%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.4%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.6%AP News: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%Matthew Brown: 6.2%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias22.9%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.5%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 1.7%AP News: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.3%This article: 4.1%Matthew Brown: 0.9%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.7%Matthew Brown: 0.7%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.6%Matthew Brown: 3.3%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority6.6%This article: 4.8%Matthew Brown: 0.5%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.4%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.2%Matthew Brown: 0.7%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.6%Matthew Brown: 6.3%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.5%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.9%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.2%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.6%Matthew Brown: 1.0%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Matthew Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground3.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.3%Matthew Brown: 1.2%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote1.3%This article: 3.5%Matthew Brown: 1.6%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection3.5%This article: 9.2%Matthew Brown: 2.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice9.2%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.3%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 33.0%Matthew Brown: 1.6%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias33.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.6%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

687 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers22%attributed speech534writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 9 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Bloch • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageMartin Heinrich • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMartin Heinrich • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMartin Heinrich • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHannah Schoenbaum • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Steve Bloch

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words19% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+62.9 ptsWriter: 37.1%Steve Bloch: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%Steve Bloch: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.