Topic summary
59% 46 analyzed articles/videos 38,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 9,886 hits . Analysis detected 123,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 157,142 analyzed words across 46 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,317 of 16,559 topics). This Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Conservation
Topic details
Total words: 157,142
Article count: 46
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score46 analyzed articles157.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst