Bald eagle believed to be Jackie healing in Ojai 30%

By Laura Baisas11%

7/21/2026, 4:49:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 883 faulty-reasoning hits from 865 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,526 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the article peer group.

The Ojai Raptor Center in Southern California is currently caring for Adult Bald Eagle 26-519, who is believed to be the internet-famous eagle mom named Jackie . 
On July 18, the San Dimas Raptor Rescue found the eagle weak, vulnerable, and unable to fly. 
The eagle was transferred to and is being evaluated by the Ojai Raptor Center’s veterinary team. 
The bird is underweight but alert, and is even perching and eating with assistance. 
Test results should come back within the next few days to confirm or rule out any suspected issues. 
Adult Bald Eagle 26-519 is believed to be an eagle named Jackie. 
Image: Ojai Raptor Center. 
“Wildlife medicine is different from working with domestic animals in many ways. 
Our patients don’t have owners or caretakers who can tell us what happened to them or what symptoms they’ve been experiencing in recent days,” the Ojai Raptor Center wrote . 
“Every case begins with many unknowns, and recovery depends on factors we’re still investigating, including bloodwork and toxicology results, which take time. 
Until we understand the full picture, we can’t responsibly predict a timeline or outcome. 
What we can promise is thorough, attentive care every step of the way.” 
Millions around the world have watched the day-to-day lives of Jackie, her partner Shadow, and their current chicks Sandy and Luna via a 24/7 livestream of their nest. 
Shadow has been taking care of both Sandy and Luna in the meantime, ahead of their impending fledging . 
This story is developing and we will continue to monitor the situation. 
Viewers can continue to monitor Shadow, Sandy, and Luna via the eagle nest cam livestream. 
Jackie and Shadow’s 2026 babies: Everything you need to know 
It’s been another roller coaster nesting season for Jackie and Shadow , a pair of internet-famous bald eagle parents living in San Bernardino National Forest in Southern California. 
After two of their eggs were destroyed by ravens in January, Jackie and Shadow laid two new eggs that have successfully hatched. 
Chick 1 hatched on April 4 at 9:33 p.m. 
PDT, while Chick 2 followed on April 5 at 8:30 a.m. 
Their large nest in Big Bear Valley east of Los Angeles is livestreamed 24 hours a day by nonprofit Friends of Big Bear Valley (FOBBV) and has captivated millions. 
On May 1, FOBBV announced the chicks’ names: Sandy and Luna . 
How long will the chicks stay in the nest? 
Chicks usually stay in the nest until 10 to 14 weeks of age . 
What challenges do the eaglets face? 
Before leaving the nest, the chicks face threats from other birds of prey, including hawks, ravens, other eagles, and owls. 
Inclement weather can also present challenges for the chicks. 
In 2025, a March snowstorm resulted in the death of one of Jackie and Shadow’s three chicks. 
During fledging, only 70 percent of eaglets survive. 
One of the greatest threats is from cars that can injure or kill the birds while they scavenge for food on roadkill. 
Who are Jackie and Shadow? 
The pair first got together in 2018 and successfully raised chicks in 2019 and 2022. 
However, their eggs failed to hatch in 2023 and 2024. 
Only 50 percent of eagle eggs successfully hatch, so this pair has already beaten the odds. 
What happened to Jackie and Shadow’s 2025 eaglets? 
In 2025, Jackie laid three eggs that all hatched in early March. 
On March 13, a strong snowstorm dumped up to two feet of snow and battered the nest with strong winds. 
Only two of the chicks were visible on the live cam when the storm passed by the next morning. 
FOBBV later confirmed the passing of one of the chicks. 
The two surviving chicks were later named Sunny and Gizmo after 54,000 names were submitted by fans. 
What happens after chicks fledge? 
Young eagles usually fledge –or leave the nest and fly–when they can flatten their wings and have feathers capable of flight. 
This typically occurs when the birds hit 10 to 14 weeks of age . 
Males also tend to take their first flight a little sooner than females. 
According to FOBBV, fledglings from Southern California have been spotted as far south as Baja California, as far north as British Columbia, and as far east as Yellowstone National Park. 
About 70 percent of bald eagles survive the fledgling stage. 
FOBBV does not tag their eagles, so it’s not possible to follow the chicks’ journeys after they flee the nest. 
Can I help Jackie and Shadow? 
Yes. 
Environmental groups are currently fundraising $10 million to protect Jackie and Shadow’s foraging area from development. 
Learn more at SaveMoonCamp.org. 
You can also help the rescue organizations helping nurse the eagle that is likely Jackie back to health by donating to Ojai Raptor Center’s Bald Eagle Recovery Campaign . 
Why isn’t Jackie in the nest? 
On July 18, the San Dimas Raptor Rescue found an eagle weak, vulnerable, and unable to fly after a reported encounter with other eagles. 
The bald eagle is believed to be Jackie . 
The post Bald eagle believed to be Jackie healing in Ojai appeared first on Popular Science . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.2%Laura Baisas: 1.9%Popular Science: 2.2%Confirmation Bias5.2%This article: 5.5%Laura Baisas: 0.9%Popular Science: 0.8%Anchoring Bias5.5%This article: 12.0%Laura Baisas: 2.8%Popular Science: 2.7%Availability Heuristic12.0%This article: 4.0%Laura Baisas: 2.0%Popular Science: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Laura Baisas: 2.4%Popular Science: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias2.1%This article: 3.2%Laura Baisas: 2.9%Popular Science: 3.5%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 1.8%Laura Baisas: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.8%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Laura Baisas: 3.3%Popular Science: 4.6%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 1.6%Laura Baisas: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.7%Pessimism Bias1.6%This article: 1.2%Laura Baisas: 3.6%Popular Science: 3.0%Negativity Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Laura Baisas: 0.8%Popular Science: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error3.5%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Laura Baisas: 1.3%Popular Science: 2.1%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Laura Baisas: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.9%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 1.7%Laura Baisas: 0.4%Popular Science: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.4%Laura Baisas: 3.8%Popular Science: 4.2%Appeal to Authority2.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Laura Baisas: 3.1%Popular Science: 4.1%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 9.7%Laura Baisas: 1.3%Popular Science: 0.6%Bandwagon9.7%This article: 8.4%Laura Baisas: 3.1%Popular Science: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion8.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.4%Popular Science: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.8%Laura Baisas: 2.1%Popular Science: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Laura Baisas: 1.4%Popular Science: 2.2%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Laura Baisas: 2.2%Popular Science: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.0%Laura Baisas: 1.3%Popular Science: 1.5%Unattributed Quote6.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.8%Popular Science: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.5%Laura Baisas: 3.2%Popular Science: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice1.5%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 1.6%Popular Science: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Baisas: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Laura Baisas: 2.4%Popular Science: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.7%

865 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers13%attributed speech752writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageOjai Raptor Center • 12 words • 0.0% coverageOjai Raptor Center • 30 words • 100.0% coverageOjai Raptor Center • 22 words • 0.0% coverageOjai Raptor Center • 14 words • 0.0% coverageOjai Raptor Center • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageFriends of Big Bear Valley (FOBBV) • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageFriends of Big Bear Valley (FOBBV) • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ojai Raptor Center

76%flagged-word coverage
91 attributed words81% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote+33.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ojai Raptor Center: 33.0%33.0%Biased Writer Voice+14.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ojai Raptor Center: 14.3%14.3%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Ojai Raptor Center: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.