Topic summary
46% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Rescue results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 3,034 hits . Analysis detected 25,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,439 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,977 of 15,585 topics). This Animal Rescue is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Animal Rescue
Topic details
Total words: 33,439
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score17 analyzed articles33.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst