Author summary
13% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bianca Cseke results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 2,203 hits . Analysis detected 17,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,055 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (6,196 of 6,628 authors). This Bianca Cseke is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Bianca Cseke
Author details
Total words: 31,055
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles31.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst