Injured bald eagle rescued near Big Bear is believed to be Jackie 70%

By Amy Hubbard91%

7/20/2026, 5:25:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 461 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.1% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,388 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the article peer group.

A bald eagle rescued near Big Bear over the weekend is likely Jackie, one-half of the beloved pair featured in a longtime nest livestream, according to the wildlife nonprofit behind the cam. 
Based on videos and pictures from the public and rescuers, “it is apparent that the rescued eagle is likely Jackie,” Friends of Big Bear Valley said in a social media post late Sunday. 
“She is in the best place she can be and getting the care she needs.” 
The adult bald eagle was seen on the ground near Dana Point Park on Thursday and Friday. 
There’s a park by that name in the community of Fawnskin adjacent to Big Bear Lake. 
While on the ground, the eagle was seen in a fight with two sub-adult eagles, according to the nonprofit. 
“Cell phone video confirmed that the adult was able to fend off the other eagles by turning over and using its talons, but was unable to fly far away,” the organization said. 
The nonprofit said there had been no sign around the nest “for several days” of Jackie, star of the webcam reality show since 2015. 
Fans have watched as Jackie and her longtime mate, Shadow, have tragically lost eggs and offspring, and also successfully raised eaglets to leave the nest, 120 feet up a Jeffrey pine with a commanding view of Big Bear Lake. 
Their latest eaglets, Sandy and Luna, took flight for the first time late last month. 
The grounded bald eagle was picked up Saturday by personnel with the L.A. 
County Parks and Recreation San Dimas Raptor Rescue. 
“When a bald eagle was found in need near Big Bear Lake, an incredible team came together to make sure it received the care it deserved,” the agency said on Facebook. 
The eagle was taken to “a specialized rehabilitation facility, where care is now underway.” 
Fans of the Big Bear bald eagles expressed their worries on social media over the weekend as news spread of the injured bird. 
The Friends of Big Bear Valley warned of “misinformation and speculation online” surrounding the incident and the identity of the eagle. 
And fans were advised not to contact the rescue agency: “They do not have the resources.” 
“It’s been a very worrying wait this weekend with Jackie MIA,” said one commenter on the nonprofit’s Instagram account. 
One user, on the Parks and Recreation Department post noted: “That’s her, no doubt. 
Been watching for 2 years now i know her better than some of my own relatives.” 
Following the announcement by the nonprofit that the eagle was indeed believed to be Jackie, a commenter replied: “Praying for a speedy recovery so she can go back to her family soon!” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.2%Amy Hubbard: 6.8%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Amy Hubbard: 7.0%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic14.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 17.1%Amy Hubbard: 8.9%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias17.1%This article: 6.9%Amy Hubbard: 9.2%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.5%Amy Hubbard: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.0%Amy Hubbard: 11.1%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias20.0%This article: 4.1%Amy Hubbard: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 22.3%Amy Hubbard: 16.1%Daily Pilot: 7.7%Negativity Bias22.3%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Amy Hubbard: 5.1%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Amy Hubbard: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 3.0%Amy Hubbard: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 31.9%Amy Hubbard: 10.6%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority31.9%This article: 3.5%Amy Hubbard: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma3.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.9%Amy Hubbard: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon6.9%This article: 29.5%Amy Hubbard: 20.2%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion29.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.2%Amy Hubbard: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.6%Amy Hubbard: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof4.6%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.5%Amy Hubbard: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal6.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.8%Amy Hubbard: 3.3%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.0%Amy Hubbard: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 2.6%Amy Hubbard: 8.2%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Hubbard: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

461 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker12%attributed speech407writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageFriends of Big Bear Valley • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageFriends of Big Bear Valley • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
54 attributed words100% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Friends of Big Bear Valley: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Friends of Big Bear Valley: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.