Keyword summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Rescue results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 778 hits . Analysis detected 5,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,803 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,345 of 37,536 keywords). This Wildlife Rescue is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Wildlife Rescue
Keyword details
Total words: 5,803
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst