Keyword summary
86%3 analyzed articles/videos1,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Big Bear results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 975 hits. Analysis detected 7,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,816 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,068 of 36,715 keywords). This Big Bear is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Big Bear
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
73%Big Bear (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,816
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate